UK time is: 05:15:35
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

DJ deal in doubt

DJ Campbell's proposed move to Blackpool has stalled.

It is believed that the two clubs are some way off in their valuations of the player, with Leicester reportedly asking for 1.5 million for the striker.

And it is unsurprising that Blackpool have baulked at the excessive price tag, despite Campbell's heroics for the Seasiders last season in the Championship.

For a player Leicester would have been happy to offload for a nominal fee not so long ago the new valuation all of a sudden seems quite outrageous to the Premier League side. Fair enough.

But can you blame us, really? We have no money ourselves, and it is little wonder we have attempted to inflate the price tag after Blackpool's promotion to the top flight.

And whilst Campbell has seemingly meant trouble since day one at the club (for various reasons not entirely his own fault), it is again understandable that we might try and recoup some of the 1.6 million we paid Birmingham City.

The likelihood is that there will be other clubs interested in taking the striker on in the Championship. Eventually.

I'm not sure we ever expected to get that kind of fee for him, but hey, it's worth starting high right?

We need him off our books and he's very much a wanted man by Ian Holloway, so the chances of a deal being done at some stage still remain high.

So let's just call this a snag...




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: JBFox Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday June 15 2010

Time: 9:43AM

Your Comments

Blackpool have earned a fortune by getting promotion. 1.5m is nothing for a player who was key to their promotion. We paid 1m for Claridge BEFORE he was won us promotion 15 years ago so what is 1.5m for a player proven to perform for them. They're just being cheap, and although we want rid of him I'm glad that we're sticking to our guns and demanding some money for him. If they won't pay then they'll lose out. It's their choice!!!!
shipleyskip
Nobody will buy Dudley until they know whether Her Majesty intends to detain him at her pleasure Middxile
Middxile
Just get rid of him. We should do 1M and another 1M if Blackpool stay up
Proud_Fox
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Leicester City Articles

Simpson Signs Three Year Deal (Saturday August 30 2014)

Pearson - We Have To Be More Clinical (Saturday August 30 2014)

Leicester's Persistence Paid Off (Saturday August 30 2014)

Logan Extends Rochdale Spell (Thursday August 28 2014)

Pearson - We Didn't Do Enough (Wednesday August 27 2014)

Stats: Leicester v Shrewsbury (Tuesday August 26 2014)

King & Kasp Talk Chelsea (Sunday August 24 2014)

Plenty Of Positives For Pearson (Sunday August 24 2014)

Archived Leicester City Articles

List All Vital Leicester  Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Chelsea 2 - 0 Leicester City
Leicester City 2 - 2 Everton

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Man Utd 3 0 2 1 -1 2
15. Newcastle 3 0 2 1 -2 2
16. Everton 3 0 2 1 -3 2
17. WBA 3 0 2 1 -3 2
18. Leicester City 2 0 1 1 -2 1
19. Crystal Palace 3 0 1 2 -3 1
20. Burnley 3 0 1 2 -3 1

Breaking League News

Slip or Not, There Was Only Going To Be 1 Winner
Swansea : 30/08/2014 22:16:00
Simpson Seals Leicester Switch
Q.P.R. : 30/08/2014 22:07:00
Austin Off The Mark
Q.P.R. : 30/08/2014 21:48:00
NUFC v Crystal Palace Match Analysis
Newcastle : 30/08/2014 21:21:00
Martinez Disappointed With Defending
Everton : 30/08/2014 21:16:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

COC - Shrewsbury MotM
Suggested By:  Svens
Hamer 1%
Pearson 66%
Moore 0%
Konchesky 0%
Wasilewski 0%
Mahrez 0%
Cain 0%
Watson 0%
Knockaert 0%
Taylor-Fletcher 33%
Wood 0%
Sub - Nugent 0%
Sub - King 0%
Sub - Schlupp 0%